Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T's overall score of 83. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a a bit heavier cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, but they are 0.36inches thick. Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS, and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with Android 10 OS.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a better pixel amount in each screen inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A32. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A32. Both of them have the same (4K) video resolution, a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a F1.8 diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T and Galaxy A32 count with really similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.