Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-10 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 437 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A40's general score of 79.6. Despite being the best we compare here, it must be noted that it is also heavier and thicker. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A40, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels and a little bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and a way better (4K) video definition.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy A40, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.