Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-06 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.11 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A42 has a general score of 87, which is better than the vivo X60 Pro's global score of 78.8. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 operating system. Although it's the best we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A42 construction is thicker and just a bit heavier than vivo X60 Pro.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A42, and although they both have a same size screen, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher pixel amount per inch of display and a much higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution. The vivo X60 Pro has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A42, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A42 has a greater memory to store more apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A42 has better battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 19% greater battery size.
The vivo X60 Pro shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A42, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a 48 MP back-facing camera and a same size aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has faster video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.