Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-01-08 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.70 x 2.80 x 0.29 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), getting a general score of 76.4 against 71.9. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, the Motorola Droid Turbo body is older, heavier and incredibly thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016). The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has lesser processing cores , it also counts with an additional GPU and more RAM.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter screen than Galaxy A5 (2016), and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better pixel amount in each inch of screen. The Galaxy A5 (2016) features more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has just 16 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo features a superior camera than Galaxy A5 (2016), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality and a back camera with a much better 20.7 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.