Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's overall score of 79.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A50s has older 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Pro has Android 11. Galaxy A50s is an older cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it's lighter and just a bit thinner anyway.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a little bigger display, a better display pixels density and a better 1440 x 3216 resolution. The Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM. OPPO Find X3 Pro captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a more MP back camera, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger camera aperture for better low-light images and video and a much larger sensor shooting much better quality photos.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.