Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-20 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's overall score of 81. The Samsung Galaxy A50s body is much newer and lighter than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it is also just a little bit thicker. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Galaxy A50s features a bit better processor than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have 8 cpu cores and 6 GB of RAM. The Galaxy A50s counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a just a bit greater pixel density, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy C9 Pro has a battery duration that's very similar to Galaxy A50s's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.