Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A50s's 86.6 general score. Even being the best we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 body is older, somewhat thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960.
Galaxy Note9 has as much memory capacity for apps and games as the Galaxy A50s one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Note9 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50s. They have a 6 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a lot tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution and a much bigger camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a battery performance that is just as good as the battery life in Galaxy A50s.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.