Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-10-20 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, having a general score of 86.6 against 81.5. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has Android 13 version. The Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little smaller display and a little bit worse amount of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A50s features a very superior CPU than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S23 Ultra takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A50s, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and videos, a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy A50s has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S23 Ultra counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.