Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is better than Xperia XZ1, with a overall score of 86.6 against 78.3. The Galaxy A50s is a newer cellphone than the Xperia XZ1, although it is just a bit heavier and just a bit thicker. The Xperia XZ1 has a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
Xperia XZ1 counts with a CPU that's just as good as Galaxy A50s's processor, and although the Xperia XZ1 has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xperia XZ1 features a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A50s takes better videos and photos than Xperia XZ1, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a really longer battery duration than Xperia XZ1, because it has a 48 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.