Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Green, Pink and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3180mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is slightly better than Sony Xperia XZ2, with a overall score of 86.6 against 79.1. Galaxy A50s is a newer phone, and it's also notably thinner and somewhat lighter than the Sony Xperia XZ2. Xperia XZ2 has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A50s, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Xperia XZ2 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels quantity per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A50s captures slightly better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a larger sensor and a camera in the back with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A50s has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ2, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s has improved battery life than Xperia XZ2, because it has a 26 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.