Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is a bit better than Xperia XZ3, having a overall score of 86.6 against 79.6. Galaxy A50s's body is newer, notably thinner and lighter than Xperia XZ3. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version and Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Sony Xperia XZ3 features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A50s, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xperia XZ3 features a sharper display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a better display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ3, because it has a 20% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a superior camera than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a F2 camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.