Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is much better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 86.6 score against 77.8. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Galaxy A50s is a older and way thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it notably lighter anyway.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has a larger display, a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a quite better number of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A50s counts with a much faster CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy A50s, because it has a back facing camera with a better resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better video resolution and a larger aperture for better images and video in low light situations. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy A50s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.