Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A50s body has the same thickness than vivo X60 Pro, but it is just a little lighter. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2376 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
The vivo X60 Pro shoots slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels resolution and the same back camera sensor size, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to take better photos in low light situations and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo X60 Pro has a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.