Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's score of 85.5. The Galaxy A50s design is newer, somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Pocophone F1. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50s, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246px, a little smaller screen and a bit inferior pixel amount per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s takes better videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a way larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos and a camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a battery life that's just as good as the Galaxy A50s one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.