Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than Google Nexus 6P, having a score of 90.8 against 80.3. Even though the Galaxy A51 5G is much newer than the Google Nexus 6P, it's thicker and a little heavier. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Galaxy A51 5G features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G features a better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a lot better resolution back camera and a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy A51 5G is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.