Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a 90.8 score against 77.9. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a a lot newer and incredibly thinner device than Motorola DROID Turbo, but it is just a bit heavier.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Galaxy A51 5G has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A51 5G has a little longer battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Galaxy A51 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a back facing camera with a much better resolution and faster 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Although Galaxy A51 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy A51 5G, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.