Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 general score. Even being the best in our current comparison, we must tell that it is also a lot older, just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bit larger display and a slightly better 1220 x 2712 resolution. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with more storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bigger camera aperture, a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a higher resolution back camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 has just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.