Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, getting a score of 90.8 against 79.9. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G construction is a little bit lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, but it is just a little bit thicker and was released just 11 months before.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a greater pixels quantity per inch of screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels and a little larger display.
Galaxy A51 5G features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, a much larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a higher resolution back-facing camera and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a battery life that's very similar to the Galaxy A51 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.