Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-29 | -- |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | -- |
| Prism cube black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than the Galaxy S23 Ultra, having a score of 90.8 against 81.5. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version and Galaxy S23 Ultra has Android 13 version. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a bit smaller screen, a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit lower display density.
Galaxy A51 5G has a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy S23 Ultra captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back facing camera with a much better 200 mega pixels resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a way bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S23 Ultra features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.