Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is better than Xperia XZ1's 78.3 general score. Galaxy A51 5G's construction is incredibly newer than the Xperia XZ1's, but it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Xperia XZ1 features a slightly better display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
Xperia XZ1 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a better camera than Xperia XZ1, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a back camera with a lot better resolution and a larger back camera sensor shooting higher quality pictures.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ1, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G has a really longer battery performance than Xperia XZ1, because it has a 67 percent greater battery size.
Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.