Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 global score. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's body is lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is much thicker and was released 4 years before.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper display than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a bigger screen, a just a bit better pixel number per inch of screen and a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy A51 5G features a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 27 percent more battery capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a back camera with more mega pixels, a much higher video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and video.
The Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.