Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 general score. Galaxy A51 5G is a better phone than the vivo X60 Pro, it must be told that it's also an older, somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier phone. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a quite lower number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. Galaxy A51 5G has a little better battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7% greater battery capacity. The vivo X60 Pro features a bit better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels, a same size back-facing camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has better video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.