Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's score of 85.5. The Galaxy A51 5G is a newer and a bit thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, although it's just a bit heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a little bit worse pixels number in each inch of screen, a bit worse 1080 x 2246 resolution and a little bit smaller screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a slightly better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 744 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.