Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2021-03-17 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is slightly better than Apple iPhone SE (2022)'s global score of 86.6. Galaxy A52's construction is older, notably heavier and somewhat thicker than Apple iPhone SE (2022). The iPhone SE (2022) counts with a superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52, although it has a way worse 750 x 1334 resolution, a little bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a way smaller screen. Galaxy A52 features a much better camera than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much longer battery life than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2018mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.