Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 score. The Galaxy A52 body has the same thickness than LG V50 ThinQ, but it is just a little heavier. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A52. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. LG V50 ThinQ features more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit superior battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.