Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is better than Motorola Edge 50's general score of 81.2. Although Samsung Galaxy A52 is better than Motorola Edge 50, it must be told that it is also a noticeably older, a little heavier and just a bit thicker phone. Motorola Edge 50 has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a just a bit better pixels count in each inch in the display, a bit higher 1220 x 2712 resolution and a bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A52 captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Edge 50 has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.