Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than Moto G Stylus's score of 79.7. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than Moto G Stylus. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a quite larger screen, a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit greater pixels amount in each inch of display.
The Galaxy A52 has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots clearer videos and photos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy A52 has slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit superior battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 13% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.