Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2021-03-17 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's 90.5 general score. Galaxy A52's construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, but it is just a little lighter. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy A52. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G and Samsung Galaxy A52 both have incredibly similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a little inferior pixel amount in each inch of screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A52 has slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a bigger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments, a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality photographs and videos and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy A52 and the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G both have very similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.