Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2021-03-17 | -- |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than Galaxy S23 Ultra's 81.5 score. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a little worse count of pixels per inch of display, a bit smaller display and a much lower 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much greater performance than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A52, because it has a lot better resolution back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
The Galaxy A52 features a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy S23 Ultra counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.