Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than the Xperia XZ3, with a 90.7 score against 79.6. Galaxy A52 is a way newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and just a bit lighter than the Xperia XZ3. Sony Xperia XZ3 features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A52 has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a superior camera than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a camera with lot more MP, a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.