Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-17 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than vivo X60 Pro, getting a 90.7 score against 78.8. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a just a bit heavier and just a little thicker cellphone than vivo X60 Pro. Vivo X60 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a little bit lower pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. Galaxy A52 has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 captures clearer photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy A52 has a bit better battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.