Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2021-03-17 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, getting a general score of 90.7 against 85.5. Even though the Galaxy A52 is just a bit heavier than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, it's just a little bit thinner and newer. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a bit worse pixel count in each inch of display, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 and a little smaller screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A52, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 256 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A52 takes much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.