Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-20 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a global score of 84.2, which is slightly better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Galaxy A7 (2018)'s body is a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the vivo X70 Pro, although it was released 3 years before. Vivo X70 Pro features a little faster processor than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Vivo X70 Pro features a display that's very similar to Galaxy A7 (2018)'s display, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a little bigger display. Galaxy A7 (2018) features a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X70 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels, a lot better (4K) video definition and a way bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.