Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.9 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-16 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Prism bricks black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 650.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M31's score of 86.5. Galaxy A71 5G UW is a a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy M31, although both of them were released with only a few months difference. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy M31 has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little higher pixel count per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy M31, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better camera than Galaxy M31. Both have the same diafragm aperture, a same resolution back camera, the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same back camera sensor size and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates.
The Galaxy M31 has superior battery duration than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 33% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.