Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-06-19 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 381.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the vivo X70 Pro, with a general score of 91.8 against 78.3. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G construction is older, just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the vivo X70 Pro.
The Galaxy A71 5G and the vivo X70 Pro both have similar screens, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel density. The vivo X70 Pro has a bit better processor than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G takes a bit better pictures and videos than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, a tinier back camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light captures, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels.
Galaxy A71 5G features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G and the vivo X70 Pro both count with extremely similar battery durations, although the vivo X70 Pro has a 1% smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.