Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-01-06 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is a bit better than the Galaxy A8 (2018), getting an 81.2 score against 79.2. The Motorola Edge 50 design is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy A8 (2018)'s, although it is just a little bit heavier. Galaxy A8 (2018) features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a bigger screen, a just a bit better count of pixels in each inch in the display and a slightly higher 1220 x 2712 resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 features a way better camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting images and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a much more MP camera in the back.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.