Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-01-06 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A8 (2018) has a global score of 79.2, which is slightly better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. The Galaxy A8 (2018) is a notably older and thicker phone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it much lighter anyway. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better display than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a little bit worse display density, it also counts with a way higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a really larger screen.
The Galaxy A8 (2018) features a much powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.