Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-01-06 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) has a general score of 79.2, which is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's score of 78.8. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) is incredibly older and a little bit thicker than the vivo X60 Pro, it's construction is still just a little bit lighter. Vivo X60 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) has a bit better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the display. The vivo X60 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Vivo X60 Pro has a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 Pro features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 40% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.