Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2019-05-29 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A80, with an 88.1 score against 84.9. The Apple iPhone X body is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A80, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. Apple iPhone X features a brighter display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly higher 1125 x 2436px resolution.
IPhone X features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has less processing cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Galaxy A80 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone X, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor.
IPhone X has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3700mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.