Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-05-29 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 2, having a overall score of 84.9 against 81.6. The Samsung Galaxy A80 is a newer cellphone than Google Pixel 2, but it is noticeably heavier and thicker. The Google Pixel 2's processor is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A80's processor, and although the Google Pixel 2 has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy A80 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a way bigger back camera sensor.
Google Pixel 2 counts with as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as Galaxy A80, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A80 features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.