Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-05-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3, getting an 84.9 score against 80. Samsung Galaxy A80's construction is thicker and heavier than Google Pixel 3. The Google Pixel 3 has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
The Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A80 captures better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a way bigger sensor and a way better resolution camera.
The Galaxy A80 counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A80 has better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.