Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-29 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a, getting a general score of 84.9 against 78.8. The Galaxy A80 is a way heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the Google Pixel 3a. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels count in each display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A80 features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A80 has greater battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3700mAh battery size. Galaxy A80 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.