Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-29 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, having an 84.9 score against 78.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A80 is better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, it must be told that it is also incredibly heavier and thicker. Google Pixel 3a XL has a display that's very similar to Galaxy A80's display, because although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels number in each inch in the display.
The Galaxy A80 features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A80 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A80 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3a XL and Galaxy A80 count with similar batteries duration. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot bigger sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.