Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-05-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a global score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4's overall score of 81.9. Even being the best we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy A80 design is somewhat thicker and much heavier than the Google Pixel 4. The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A80, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A80 captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A80 has longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 32% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.