Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-05-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL, getting a overall score of 84.9 against 82.9. The Galaxy A80 is better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, we must note that it is also somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A80, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A80 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A80 features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a battery lifetime that is just as good as Galaxy A80's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.