Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a global score of 84.9, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a's score of 82.9. Even being the best we compare here, we must note that it is also an older, somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier cellphone. The Google Pixel 4a and Galaxy A80 both feature similar processing units, and although the Google Pixel 4a has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater quantity of pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy A80 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photos or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Google Pixel 4a and Galaxy A80 have extremely similar storage for games and applications, both of them have equal internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.