Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy A80, with an 87.5 score against 84.9. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer phone, and it's also thinner and much lighter than Galaxy A80. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
Google Pixel 4a 5G and Galaxy A80 count with incredibly similar memory for applications and games, both have equal internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy A80, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 captures clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures and videos and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.