Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-05-29 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A80's general score of 84.9. Google Pixel 5 is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than Samsung Galaxy A80. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A80. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 5 features just a bit better display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A80 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a much larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and a much more MP camera.
The Google Pixel 5 and Galaxy A80 feature very similar storage capacity for apps and games, they have exactly the same internal memory. The Google Pixel 5 features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A80, because it has a 10% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.