Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-05-29 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is a bit better than the HTC One M9, having a overall score of 84.9 against 77.7. The Galaxy A80 is a noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner cellphone than HTC One M9, although it is also way heavier. HTC One M9 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and an additional graphics processor.
The HTC One M9 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density. The Galaxy A80 has a much greater storage for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy A80 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A80 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography, a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a bigger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A80 features superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.