Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| 2019-05-29 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is much better than HTC U Ultra, getting an 84.9 score against 77. The Galaxy A80 is a noticeably newer device than the HTC U Ultra, although it's incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a bit superior processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
HTC U Ultra features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch of display. HTC U Ultra counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A80, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A80 counts with better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Galaxy A80 takes clearer photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor and a way better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.